The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has launched a probe into allegations against two Superintendents of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) for purportedly soliciting an undue advantage of Rs 22 lakh from a bullion trader. This case unveils a distressing narrative of corruption within the tax administration system.
Background: On March 15, a complaint was lodged by a bullion trader against Satish Sharma and Ankur Godyan, Superintendents at CGST, Mumbai South Commissionerate. The complainant, engaged in the Gold Bullion business at Zaveri Bazar, alleged that he was coerced into paying an illicit sum of Rs 22 lakh.
Sequence of Events: The ordeal commenced with a summons issued by Ankur Godyan, directing the submission of business-related documents. Subsequently, another summons was dispatched to the complainant’s son, compelling oral testimony. In an alarming turn of events, the complainant was summoned to the CGST office on February 7, where he was confronted by Sharma and Godyan, demanding illicit gratification to resolve the matter.
Coercion and Intimidation: Sharma, Godyan, and another official subjected the complainant to interrogation, revealing an alleged tax liability of approximately Rs 3 crore. The officials detained the complainant until the early hours of March 15, coercing him into compliance by stating that unless the purported sum was paid, he would not be permitted to leave.
Demand for Bribe: In a blatant display of corruption, the accused officials demanded a bribe of Rs 30 lakh from the complainant to purportedly settle the matter. Subsequently, the complainant was released on the condition of assuring payment of Rs 22 lakh within a stipulated timeframe.
Legal Implications: The allegations levelled against the accused officials, upon discreet verification by the CBI, prima-facie reveal the commission of offences under Section 120-B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 (public servant taking gratification other than legal remuneration in respect of an official act) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Conclusion: The reprehensible actions of the accused officials underscore the pervasive nature of corruption and abuse of power within government institutions. Such instances not only erode public trust but also inflict severe harm on the integrity of the tax administration system. It is imperative for law enforcement agencies to undertake swift and stringent measures to combat corruption and uphold the principles of accountability and justice.
Visit www.cagurujiclasses.com for practical courses
